Pashman Stein Walder Hayden P.C. Named New Jersey Law Journal’s Law Firm of the Year 2023*

PDF

David Cinotti Authors Article in the New Jersey Law Journal, “What to Know About New Jersey Court’s Ruling in 'Quasi-in-Rem' Jurisdiction Case for Arbitral Awards”

Publication
New Jersey Law Journal
5.9.24

David Cinotti, Partner at Pashman Stein Walder Hayden P.C., recently authored an article in the New Jersey Law Journal titled, “What to Know About New Jersey Court’s Ruling in 'Quasi-in-Rem' Jurisdiction Case for Arbitral Awards.” The article discusses a recent New Jersey district-court case, Simplot India v. Himalay Food International, which held that the court lacked personal jurisdiction to enforce a foreign arbitral award under the New York Convention against an Indian respondent.  The petitioner, which won the arbitration, argued that the court had quasi-in-rem jurisdiction over the respondent, which lost the arbitration, because the respondent’s New Jersey affiliate owed the respondent money from goods that the respondent sold the affiliate.  The court concluded that the petitioner had to show that the respondent had a clear right to money in the affiliate’s New Jersey bank account to assert quasi-in-rem jurisdiction. 

The article suggests that the court took an unduly restrictive approach to quasi-in-rem jurisdiction because it did not apply caselaw holding that due process is satisfied in an action to enforce a judgment where the judgment-debtor has any property (tangible or intangible), or consider the respondent’s intangible right to payment, which should have been deemed located in New Jersey, where the affiliate was located. The article contends that “an award-debtor can reasonably be haled into court where it has a property right—tangible or intangible—that could be used to satisfy an arbitral award in whole or in part.”

The article concludes:

“In future cases under the New York Convention, parties should consider making broader arguments about the types of property rights that can support quasi-in-rem jurisdiction including focusing on intangible property rights that might be deemed located in the state where enforcement is sought.”

To read the full article, click here.

Related Attorneys

Jump to Page

Pashman Stein Walder Hayden P.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek