Employment Discrimination against Medical Marijuana User?

As the NJ
legislature continues to debate the legalization of adult use marijuana, the NJ
Appellate Division has issued an important decision addressing a controversial
topic – the right of employers to discipline employees who use marijuana
outside of work.

In this case,
Wild vs. Carriage Funeral Holdings, a cancer patient, who had been prescribed
medical marijuana and who used the marijuana only after work hours and at home,
was terminated after his employer learned of his medical marijuana use and
inability, therefore, to pass an employer required drug test.  The
employee then sued alleging violations of, among other things, the NJ law
against discrimination.

The NJ medical
marijuana law states that nothing in it requires an employer to accommodate an
employee’s medical use of marijuana in the workplace.  Based on that
statutory language, the employer argued that a discrimination claim could not
proceed.  The Appellate Court rejected that argument and held that nothing
in the medical marijuana act “immunized employers from obligations already
imposed elsewhere”, including under the law against discrimination.  The
Court explained that nothing in the act “created new employment rights nor destroyed
existing employment rights.”

Because the
case was only at the initial pleading stage, the court noted that the employer
may ultimately succeed by showing that the termination was because the employee
was unable to perform the tasks required for his job or because his inability
to pass a drug test would jeopardize its licensing.

The decision does not resolve all of the issues relating to employment and medical marijuana but it does make clear that, under the right circumstances, an employer can be liable for discrimination against a medical marijuana patient.

Pashman Stein Walder Hayden is carefully monitoring developments in New Jersey and federally with respect to marijuana legislation and will be available to help its clients navigate the sure-to-be complex regulatory framework of this potential business frontier.

Please contact Sean Mack at smack@pashmanstein.com or 201.270.4919 for further information.

  • Sean  Mack
    Partner

    Sean Mack is the co-chair of the firm's Litigation practice and chair of the firm’s Cannabis & Hemp practice. He also serves as a member of the firm's Executive Committee. Clients turn to Sean for his steadfast guidance, sincere ...

Stay Connected

Recent Posts

Contributors

Jump to Page

Pashman Stein Walder Hayden P.C. Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek