Posts from June 2015.

OPRA expressly provides that the right to institute any proceeding belongs “solely” to a records requestor.  Despite this, there has been a recent trend in public agencies dragging OPRA requestors into court—often over requests that the requestor would have not have chosen to litigate.

One such case is Township of Hamilton v. Harry Scheeler, in which CJ Griffin of Pashman Stein represented Mr. Scheeler.  Upon belief that the Township was not complying with the records retention schedule for video surveillance tapes, Mr. Scheeler filed an OPRA request for 30 days of video ...

Stay Connected

Recent Posts

Contributors

Jump to Page

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use